<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Blog on Rathtakrit</title><link>https://rathtakrit.github.io/blog/</link><description>Recent content in Blog on Rathtakrit</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><managingEditor>Kritarath Thipsoonthonsak</managingEditor><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://rathtakrit.github.io/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Learning to Learn</title><link>https://rathtakrit.github.io/blog/learning-to-learn/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://rathtakrit.github.io/blog/learning-to-learn/</guid><description>What I learned from Prof. Barbara Oakley&amp;#39;s special lecture on building minds in the age of AI</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday (13th April 2026) I got a chance to listen to the one and only, Prof. Barbara Oakley, well known from the famous &ldquo;Learning How to Learn&rdquo; course. To be completely 100% honest, I never studied the course, but I&rsquo;ve heard overwhelmingly positive responses since I was a kid. So that&rsquo;s why I joined the class.</p>
<p><strong>Learning how to actually learn</strong> is undoubtedly the most important skill to have in 2026, because knowledge is easier than ever to capture. As well as the powerful large language models that can quickly aggregate the subject of your interest and do awesome things with it (guiding, explaining, visualizing, metaphoring, you name it!)</p>
<p>Without further ado, let&rsquo;s see what I learned from the special lecture</p>
<h2 id="building-minds-in-the-age-of-ai-why-smarter-technology-is-making-us-dumber">Building minds in the age of AI, Why smarter technology is making us dumber</h2>
<h2 id="the-2-system">The 2 system</h2>
<p>To first understand how we can build great minds, we have to quickly understand how our mind (brain) works. In the book by Daniel Kahneman, the brain is comprised of two systems</p>
<ol>
<li>The Quick, Intuition, and Non-Conscious brain</li>
<li>The Slow, Thinking, and Conscious brain</li>
</ol>
<p>The systems work and support each other. We can&rsquo;t use the slow brain to do everything since it&rsquo;s, well, slow, you cannot play any sport by thinking! You need the quick response. The same goes for the fast brain, you cannot automatically solve complex problems based on your intuition, you need the thinking brain!</p>
<p>That is a really quick summary of how the brain works, but if you want a more in-depth explanation from someone much smarter than me, I highly suggest the video by Veritasium that explains this concept so well <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBVV8pch1dM&amp;t=233s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBVV8pch1dM&amp;t=233s</a></p>
<h2 id="chatgpt--human-brain">ChatGPT = human Brain?</h2>
<p>If you have been following AI and LLMs, you may have heard of the highly praised paper &ldquo;Attention is All You Need&rdquo; — it&rsquo;s the paper that introduced us to the Transformer architecture, which is the foundation for today&rsquo;s pretentiously sophisticated chatbots, and quite frankly, it&rsquo;s modeled similarly to how our brain operates.</p>
<p>quick checklist on what we got the same</p>
<ul>
<li>encoding and decoding part</li>
<li>attention and weighting</li>
<li>neural network and our neurons</li>
<li>nobody really understands why it&rsquo;s smart</li>
</ul>
<p>It&rsquo;s wonderful when you pay attention to how technology mimics nature, from natural stripes in camouflage to the brain itself</p>
<figure>
  <img src="/blog/learning-to-learn/ai-vs-brain.jpeg" width="1024" height="768" alt="Information of AI compared to brain" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
</figure>
<p>Again, if you have messed around with Deep Learning in any form. The way this system becomes smart is basically data, a large amount of DATA. As the most cliché analogy goes, Deep Learning / Neural network is a blackbox, you put data in, it adjusts the parameters by itself, and gets better</p>
<p>When we&rsquo;re downloading the data to train our model, we have 2 sets of data: Training and Testing. When DL models first learn on the training data, they operate well when tested on the training data, but if we try to use the test data, it underperforms tremendously. It was until the training reached a certain threshold when our model reached its capability and it can operate well on the testing data</p>
<p>Similarly, our brain operates very similarly and we call that threshold of jumping &ldquo;Grokking&rdquo;</p>
<figure>
  <img src="/blog/learning-to-learn/grokking_hu_a25cadc8360ac7a.webp" width="1400" height="810" alt="Grokking threshold" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
</figure>
<h2 id="no-its-not">No it&rsquo;s not,</h2>
<p>The truth is, the similarity only finishes in the quick system of the brain, by having a lot of data, training it, adjusting parameters until it fits.</p>
<p>Similar to humans when we use the quick brain. When we&rsquo;re using our motor skills, let&rsquo;s say football, you basically cannot ronaldo on your first day. Most likely you can&rsquo;t even juggle, but after a series of practice and adjusting your body little by little, you will become better</p>
<p>But our brain also has the slow system, and this is where everything is different. The slow system does not work better by adjusting everything, it works better by recalling the systems it already has remembered. I&rsquo;ll put it in an analogy Prof. Barbara explained in the lecture: when we&rsquo;re learning something new it&rsquo;s like constructing a chain in the brain, and when it&rsquo;s first constructed, it will have weak links and might dissolve later, but if you try to recall it, pulling the chain repeatedly, it will slowly become better and better</p>
<p>Also as a bonus, when the Slow brain learns something for so long, it will pick up the simpler underlying pattern, which then can translate into the fast brain. These underlying patterns that DISTILL into the automatic system are why senior doctors&rsquo; intuition tends to be correct</p>
<figure>
  <img src="/blog/learning-to-learn/brain-chain.jpeg" width="1024" height="768" alt="Brain chain analogy" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
</figure>
<h2 id="model-fitting-our-brain">Model fitting our brain</h2>
<p>So far we established that we have 2 brain systems, our brain is basically a deep learning model, and the deep learning model has a certain threshold for it to become really smart, and we call that GROKKED. As well as the brain operates better by recalling in the slow system, training it until it becomes grokked.</p>
<figure>
  <img src="/blog/learning-to-learn/teachers-matter.jpeg" width="1024" height="768" alt="Teachers matter research slide" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
</figure>
<p>Another thing Barbara mentioned is the importance of instructed learning. AI gets way better when it was instructed in their training dataset, and it&rsquo;s also the same for humans, as in this research showing that direct instruction is the best method of teaching</p>
<p>So, as a good student, I would like to use this lecture I have learned and apply it to the testing data, and create my learning to learn 2026 with AI guide, with the core ideology of leveraging AI tools for learning. As you mentioned, AI shows the knowledge, but we&rsquo;re the ones who own it~</p>
<ol>
<li>Instruction: Before learning any topic, I try to research the best course to learn with, how I should structure my learning, and also let AI guide me through the study plan</li>
<li>Training: As I mostly take all my notes on my laptop in a Zettelkasten system, I already have a system that can store all my knowledge. However the system is mostly stale since I take notes and leave them as is. Now I try to quiz myself with AI on all the notes I took weekly, as well as learning more new things here. So both creating new links and strengthening the old ones. Also trying to keep it at 85% Baseline</li>
<li>Testing: to put it into practice, I try to write a blog on new topics I encounter weekly, so I put myself through a test and see if what I studied has been grokked or not</li>
</ol>
<h2 id="leaving-notes">Leaving notes</h2>
<p>One last thing I wanted to point out, I have so many things I wanted to learn but I never tried to put in real effort in my learning. But your lecture has significantly changed my mind. I would love to know more about learning to learn, and start learning all the things that have been stuck in my head!</p>
<p>Truly inspiring, I try my best to upload this blog, even though this one really sucks, and keep improving from now on.</p>
<p>Thank you Barbara for being such a wonderful person. I truly learn a lot from you</p>
<p>Best,
Kiwi 14/4/2026</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Notes, Values Markmanson</title><link>https://rathtakrit.github.io/blog/notes-values-markmanson/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:57:59 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://rathtakrit.github.io/blog/notes-values-markmanson/</guid><description>Recently watched Mark&amp;#39;s new podcast, and this is the some notes I took for my zettlekasten</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*This is a notes so it may not make anysense to you guys, but it serves as a great reminder for me to remember what I have learnt</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Great podcast, totally recommend to watch <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvXdMPNhp9M">How to Find and Live by Your Values [SOLVED]</a></p></blockquote>
<h1 id="chapter-1">Chapter 1</h1>
<p>What is a value?</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Modern theory by Shalom Schwartz: “Belief about trans-situational goal of varying importance that serve as a guiding principles in the life of a person or group&quot;</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>6 Key characteristic of values</p>
<ul>
<li>Link with emotion</li>
<li>Motivate Action</li>
<li>Apply across context</li>
<li>Standard for moral judgement</li>
<li>Ranked in importance</li>
<li>Include trade-off</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>Schwartz’s values survey: people all have these values but varies in importanc</p>
<ul>
<li>Achievement</li>
<li>Power</li>
<li>Tradition</li>
<li>Security</li>
<li>Conformity</li>
<li>Universalism</li>
<li>Benevolence</li>
<li>Stimulation</li>
<li>Self Direction</li>
<li>Hedonism</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>The price of carrying about something: To care about anything, the more difficult and compromise of other things in life</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Milton Rokeach distinction of values</p>
<ul>
<li>Terminal Values: end goal/ ultimate objective</li>
<li>Instrumental values: means towards end</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>Carol Ryff’s six dimension of Psychological well being</p>
<ul>
<li>Autonomy</li>
<li>Environmental Mastery</li>
<li>Personal Growth</li>
<li>Positive relation with others</li>
<li>Purpose in life</li>
<li><strong>Self Acceptance</strong> the hardest one</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h1 id="chapter-2-values--relationship">Chapter 2: Values &amp; Relationship</h1>
<ul>
<li>Attachment in relationship</li>
<li>compromise in values</li>
<li>Changing too much value for a relationship may let you lose who you actually are &lt;It’s counter productive to put love in the top of your values hierachy&gt;</li>
<li>People always sent out signal of whom they are</li>
</ul>
<h1 id="chapter-3-where-do-values-come-from">Chapter 3: Where do values come from</h1>
<ul>
<li>A combination of 1. us, 2. others</li>
<li>Try to figure out which of your values come from others- Margaret mead cultural relatives</li>
<li>A high family value society results in corruption- Jonathan Haidt’s Moral foundation theory    - Care/harm
<ul>
<li>Fairness/cheating</li>
<li>Loyalty/Betrayal</li>
<li>Authority/Subversion</li>
<li>Sancitity/Degraduate</li>
<li>Liberty Oppression</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h1 id="chapter-4-identifying-your-core-values">Chapter 4: Identifying your core values</h1>
<p>Tools to identify your values</p>
<ol>
<li>Dessert island exercise</li>
<li>Funeral: What do you want people to say about you</li>
<li>Frustration: What normally sets you off</li>
<li>Ranking and prioritizing</li>
</ol>
<h1 id="chapter-5-changing-your-values">Chapter 5: Changing your values</h1>
<ul>
<li>A change in values normally resulted from a big trauma, since it a experience of one values changing</li>
<li>PTG post traumatic growth can result in 5 ways</li>
<li>improve in relationship with others
<ul>
<li>New possibility in life</li>
<li>Improve in personal strength</li>
<li>Improve in appreciation in life</li>
<li>Spiritual development</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Also need a active rumination in cognitive reappraisal. Be aware that a social group and culture will very help in this process, and an optimistic person will be more related to openness in experience</li>
<li><strong>Debrowski</strong>, a psychologist studying PTG after war he found out about
<ul>
<li>Positive disintegration</li>
<li>since a drama in life is a destroyer of one ego, a cognitive dissonance is required for changing in values</li>
<li>A void is left unfilled, and ew have to positively filled it</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Leon Festinger</strong>, the origin of cognitive dissonace started from a cult
<ul>
<li>group of researcher pretend to be cult believers to study their habits</li>
<li>a cult that alien is going to invade the earth, and when the date come no alien appears</li>
<li>They believe that they will give up and go home however, they become even more strong believer since they can get rid of alien</li>
<li>he explain that since the cult believer have a strong valeus in community in a cult and believe what they do is for a greater good they are not willing to give out their value</li>
<li>there is 2 main way to change the trajectory of valeus
<ul>
<li>expectation reality, fuck reality im beliving in my expectation
<ul>
<li>shift in expectation, which is harder to do so since you have to give up your initial values</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>VALUES FOLLOWER ACTION</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>